Tuesday, January 28, 2014

CAPS 1- Dani Wingard

Identity is about who we are and who others think we are. We communicate our identity to others and we learn who we are through communication. It is through communication that we begin to understand ourselves and form our society (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). The social science perspective emphasizes identity created by self. It is about being an individualized, familial, and spiritual self. The interpretive perspective is about identity that is formed by communication with others. It emphasizes avowal and ascribed dimensions (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). The critical perspective is identity formed by social and historical forces. It emphasizes the conflicts of developing ones identity. The interpretive and critical perspectives both focus on the dynamic nature of identities. Sexual identity refers to one's identification with various categories of sexuality (Martin & Nakayama, 2013). The Iranian president states, "In Iran, we don't have homosexuals, like in your country." These are the types of people that make people confused on who they are and what their sexual identity is.

The Supreme Court in India has refused to review the gay sex ban. The law states that a same-sex relationship is an "unnatural offense" and punishable by a 10-year jail term. The protestors in India are trying to argue that a same-sex relationship between adults should not be considered a crime. In December the government asked the courts to review the ban because it "violated the principle of equality." The article states that this law has never been used to prosecute or arrest gays, but used by police to harass gay people. I believe that people can't control who they are and who they're destined to be. If someone is gay we should just let them be gay. We can't change them. I think that our world is the reason behind one's confusion with their sexual identity because we try to tell them they can't be who they are, basically. We say that gay marriage is illegal, same-sex relationship is illegal. It's all illegal when in reality it's just human beings who love each other. 




Intercultural communication focuses on how cultural groups differ from one another. So how homosexuals differ from heterosexuals. I think that our world can become more competent with homosexuals if we start by treating them as human beings. Yes homosexuality goes against many religious beliefs, but those people have no idea what's going on in that person's head. We can try to understand them and who they are or why they are the way they are. It's all in the perceptions that influence how we communicate and handle conflict between cultures. Our world needs to take a step back and consider what it would be like to be confused about our own sexual identity. We have to put ourselves into their shoes to try to understand. "Culture is the shifting tensions between the shared and the unshared. For example American culture has changed from master/slave to white only/black only to anti war/black power and so on. (Lee, page 89)" Why can't American culture shift from homosexuals being banned to allowing them to get married like everyone else?




References

"India Supreme Court Refuses to Review Gay Sex Ban." BBC News. BBC, 28 Jan. 2014. Web. 28 Jan. 2014.

Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K. (2013). Intercultural Communication in Contexts (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

3 comments:

  1. I really like your post because my blog was also about gay marriage and sexual identity. It is crazy to me that being gay and expressing your sexuality can get you a ten year sentence in jail!
    "this law has never been used to prosecute or arrest gays, but used by police to harass gay people." I find this awful that this is used by police, public figures, to harm citizens for who they are.
    I fully agree with you in your last paragraph. Intercultural communication is about understanding cultures are different than yours and accepting them, which goes right along with homosexuality.
    It is important for those who are homosexual to be able to identify themselves as one in their community and feel comfortable. It is also important that people who do no share that same sexual identity or come from a different culture are accepting of these people.
    Although I realize that there will always be people who do not agree with same sex marriage I think both of our blogs show that not only our country, but many countries around the world are becoming more aware and accepting of different cultural sexual identities.
    -Kate Nevanen

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dani,

    I really liked your article. The purpose of your blog, I thought, was spot on. I believe we are very fortunate to live in a country where our government allows us to be who we are and to allow us to have a say in our own beliefs or views. For me, I am against gay marriage but I am very understanding of where you come from. The reason I do not believe in gay marriage comes from my own religious views. It's just something that I believe in. Once again, I think we are all very lucky to live in a country where freedom of speech is implemented, and I too will construct my own views, just as gay marriage supporters do. Your right, I don't know what is going on in other peoples heads, however that does not sway my opinion on gay marriage. There are many things that I agree with throughout this article. One of them is love. I believe that love is something that is valuable. I will never take that away from someone.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent blog! Great work. Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete